Skilfully breaking the fabric of the day-to-day is the cheat code. It’s how you seduce people.
When talking to others, I’ve been finding that their most unexpected answers are often the ones I find the most interesting, even if sometimes they don’t answer the question.
-
Started thinking about this because of this interaction yesterday:
Girl I was meeting for the 1st time: “How do I know you’re not planning to kidnap me?”
Me: “Not in this economy”
Girl: *stares confused*
-
The other day I made a comment that would normally generate a lengthy response in a conversation with someone who has great social skills.
He paused, said Goodbye and smiled in a distinct way.
What would usually be a meaningless interaction has had me thinking about it for weeks.
I think the pause is very important here.
Precisely 2 years ago I wrote an exploratory essay on silence:
https://josemarquezgoncalves.medium.com/an-exploratory-essay-on-silence-b69edc9f1f3d
“How can I possibly explain in words what can only be said in silence?”
Now, thinking about the translation of IRL silence to the online world I reached these distinctions:
- IRL silence: physical/social context + lack of words is the message;
- 0 posting: no message (assuming no irl context);
- Posting blank: “I wanted you to know I’m posting blank”
Posting blank lacks the plausible deniability of real silence. A nuance that makes silence so much fun.
This lead me to reread a great thread by Rival from a few months ago on the game-like-nature of social interactions.
To quote a few particularly interesting sections:
"Every interaction, every move, it's all a bid, it's all a suggestion, it's all a proposal: "Shall we dance this way?". Trying to make it about information is a type error, it doesn't parse, it reads as a counter-proposal, as a lack of an ability to yes-and."
"The goal of Calvinball isn't to "win" the goal is to play. It's an infinite game, proper. You "win" by advancing the game. You advance the game by making a good move. A good move is surprising, insightful, unexpected, delights the audience, delights the players."
"Life is just a big club/bar/improv scene. There's no "winning" there's only making the game better/prettier/more interesting/more complex. *All* interactions *can* be bar interactions."
Key ideas/learnings:
> “Shall we dance this way?”
> “People want to play games”
> “The day to day/truth is boring”
> “Everyone wants to be seduced”
> “A good move is surprising, insightful, unexpected, delights the audience, delights the players.”
> “All interactions can be bar interactions”
I sort of already knew this but was viewing it from a different kind of “game frame”. In August I wrote a thread about how I've always been good at socialising in "fancy settings" - business meetings, galas, professional gatherings, academia events, etc - even though I don't come from a fancy family or environment.
This thread points to the idea of fancy settings being mostly a fake game where everyone is playing a character and people just sort of go along until someone breaks the spell.
Skilfully breaking the fabric of the day-to-day is the cheat code. It’s how you seduce people.
Essentially ending this:
Comments
Post a Comment